Top latest Five h4831 vs h4831sc Urban news
Top latest Five h4831 vs h4831sc Urban news
Blog Article
I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was establishing far more strain and was slower in comparison to the outdated stuff. I do not don't forget if I even attempted normal h4831 or not; I am imagining not.
I have made use of H4831 (and H4831SC), and I utilize it. There aren't many cartridges which i use it for as I appear normally to gravitate to other powders. Nevertheless, I can't claim that it won't do the job. It is simply that Another powders perform improved for just a provided cartridge. By way of example, within the 280, H4831 gave me great velocity and very high-quality groups with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Even so, RL19 was marginally better in precision, even though the velocity was just about identical.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo generates .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps away from a 26" barrel. I use this same powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr products, so It truly is wonderful to possess one powder for equally.
I've had a few rifles that fouled definitely terrible. Acquiring each of the copper out was a true PIA until I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
Anyway, I knew the two lbs of H4831SC employed the exact same data, but I didn't know no matter if there was just about anything diverse in between a pound of powder labeled "Severe" and one particular not so labeled. A phone to Hodgdon confirmed that they were in fact equivalent and the sole variation was The emblem around the label.
Any load data to help that? My initially thought is it is not intending to burn every one of the way and velocities will be slow and all over. Could be a pleasant fireworks Display screen!
I'm using it with a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as precise. RL22 did very well but I used to be just a little concerned about temp stability. I do think I am at seventy two grains and obtain all around 2850ish fps
excaliber explained: I have uncovered the precise h4831 vs h4831sc reverse to generally be true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally exact powder in my 300 Win Mag.
I've discovered the exact reverse being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster h4831 vs h4831sc and equally precise powder in my three hundred Earn Mag.
You might have for making a couple of more posts to get cleared to perform PM's. When you finally get to that position I might post within the classified reloading section to discover if anybody is in your area for your trade. Click on to expand...
Kansas Metropolis, MO I would seize no matter what is obtainable right now. I’ve applied equally although with my drop by load and didn’t see everything various general performance smart.
Back to previous internet site Shut When there is something with your cart, it won't be introduced around to the old web site.
Southwest Idaho I attempted H4831sc in my three hundred WM but experienced significantly better velocity and h4831 vs h4831sc precision with H1000. I might alternatively use a slower burning powder with 215g tablets.
This looks as if an excellent destination to divulge a bit more facts on Hodgdon, H4831 particularly...I the moment experienced a pound of H4831SC sit around the shelf for a variety of many years. It had been procured just before Hodgdon started publicizing the "Extraordinary" line of powders, of which the H4831s are a part.